"Nate Perkins"
"Fletis Humplebacker"
"Nate Perkins"

"Fletis Humplebacker"

...
may siphon off is as low as it gets. This after all the "disenfranchised
voters" hysteria.
...


Obviously a bunch of "hysteria" on the subject of disenfranchised
voters. Probably propagated by the Liberal Media.


Here's the part you missed, the first sentence:
"Citing a new list of more than 37,000 questionable addresses..."
Only legal votes should be counted, do you have a problem
with that? What does that have to do with disenfranchising millions
of legal voters?


Same old liberal tactics, smear, obfiscate, accuse, etc...
Whatever it takes to whip up emotional support.


I posted fourteen separate links. Are you saying that's the first
sentence in each of the fourteen links?


Nope, first one.


Okay, so here's another
article by the New York Times. Obviously the Times is just another
liberal media source out to smear, obfiscate (sic), accuse, etc:


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/01/po.../01voting.html


Usually so but here's what I mean:


[Much of the tone has been set by a propaganda war of sorts
between the parties, with the Democrats charging that efforts
are being made to suppress the vote and Republicans warning
against voter fraud or double voting.]

[Jenny Backus, another adviser to the D.N.C., said that early voting
had gone smoothly, and that Election Day would too. "For all the
Republican talk of beware, beware, millions of Americans are having
a perfectly pleasant voting experience," she said.]

Which side is promoting the hysteria? The side saying watch for
illegal voting, especially when there's more registered voters than
eligible voters, or those claiming voter suppression? No wonder
Jenny's a mouthpiece for the DNC.