Unfortunately Bo Williams cannot learn concepts without an
emotional response - feeling a factual post is
"condescending". He wants others to lie to him so he will not
feel demeaned? Sorry. There is no polite way to say this.
Bo Williams posted classic junk science reasoning. Either he
can learn from his mistake or he can feel demeaned. Because
his bookstore uses circuit breakers to switch lights, then he
declares (with neither theory nor experience) that all circuit
breakers can be used as switches. Classic symptoms of junk
science reasoning. A best friend would note these mistakes
rather than worry about silly emotions.

Bo Williams wrote:
w_tom wrote:
But fact remains: what you do in a bookstore does not prove
anything other than junk science reasoning. Provided was
knowledge about circuit breaker ratings AND how to tell the
difference between junk science verse technically logical
posts. Did your post meet the criteria of being based both on
theory and experimental evidence? No - absolutely not.
Therefore it demonstrated the principles of junk science - too
often found in that store's fiction section. If there is
insult in this, then insult is only in the mind of that
reader. Defined is the difference between a post based in
junk science verses logical reasoning.

Many adults learn manners, too, present company obviously excepted.
Bye, now. Take the last word (or 500, as seems to be your wont).