There is always one who feels it is 'adult' to demand
political correctness. Adults never need politically correct
posts. The post stands technically correct. If it insults Bo
Williams, then that part of Bo Williams is bluntly reminded
that no intent to be condescending existed in any word. It
was posted exactly as was necessary to make a technical
point. Adults say, "Good, I now understand". Lesser people
worry about insults - that actually did not exist in that
post.

Junk science reasoning was demonstrated bluntly and
accurately without wasting words on how it might be
emotionally perceived. Those who must have everything spun in
a politically correct world will be upset with the post and
therefore expose themselves. In some quarters, you can get
arrested for exposing yourself.

The only part 'nasty' in that post was how Bo Williams
emotionally perceived it. A principle of logical thinking -
that something must exist both theoretically and
experimentally - should never be posted any other way but
straight up and blunt. Some find that painful - like hard
whiskey. Sorry you worry too much about how it hurts your
throat.

But fact remains: what you do in a bookstore does not prove
anything other than junk science reasoning. Provided was
knowledge about circuit breaker ratings AND how to tell the
difference between junk science verse technically logical
posts. Did your post meet the criteria of being based both on
theory and experimental evidence? No - absolutely not.
Therefore it demonstrated the principles of junk science - too
often found in that store's fiction section. If there is
insult in this, then insult is only in the mind of that
reader. Defined is the difference between a post based in
junk science verses logical reasoning.

Bo Williams wrote:
I didn't know there were switch-rated circuit breakers and
non-switch-rated circuit breakers. I know that now, as several people
pointed that out, even before I got to your condescending diatribe.

I welcome opportunities to fill gaps in my ignorance. It's not
necessary to be nasty when you perceive such a gap.

[...]