View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 29 Oct 2004 21:31:51 GMT, (Andrew
Gabriel) wrote:

In article ,
Andy Hall writes:

The other way around, surely.

How can the rebuild cost exceed the cost of the existing building plus
the land?


What you pay for a house really has very little to do with
the cost of the land and the cost of building a house, and
much more to do with what the market will bear in that area
for x bedrooms, y reception rooms, and z bathrooms.

The land doesn't go away......


Rebuilding cost of an end-of-terrace 1895 house was nearly
double the market value. You couldn't just stick a modern
Barratt rabbit hutch up there if it burned down. You would
have to build a terraced property to join on and reasonably
well blend in to the rest (doesn't need to be a perfect
match), but to current building standards.



Agreed, but this is a brand new house......


..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl