View Single Post
  #21   Report Post  
Fred the Red Shirt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Todd Fatheree" wrote in message ...
"Jeff Harper" wrote in message
...

"Mark & Juanita" wrote in message
news:1097726011.XmOIVZjVbAPtfP+y1kB6MQ@teranews...
On 12 Oct 2004 15:48:37 -0700, (Florida
Patriot) wrote:

... snip
In fact, according to his 2003 financial disclosure form, Bush does
own part interest in "LSTF, LLC", a limited-liability company
organized "for the purpose of the production of trees for commercial
sales." (See "supporting documents" at right.)

So Bush was wrong to suggest that he doesn't have ownership of a
timber company. And Kerry was correct in saying that Bush's definition
of "small business" is so broad that Bush himself would have qualified
as a "small business" in 2001 by virtue of the $84 in business income.

... and this $84 would have influenced Bush's decisions how?


Uh, Kerry used Bush to illustrate that the Bush stats considered Bush a
small business owner.


Remind me why this is important.


Bush can afford to pay more taxes.

You're welcome.

It is not unimportant that numerous OTHER small busines owners
are less able to afford that.

But it is absurd to suppose that taxes should never be raised
(or lowered). A reasonable consideration of which, when and
on whom and what would be nice but I abandoned all hope of
that happening long ago.

--

FF