At best, FOX chose the photo most flattering to Bush, despite the
fact that it gave an unrealistic impression.

At worse, they used a doctored photo. (Yes, the two photos are
different,
but how do you explain the fact that Bush is so tall in the FOX photo?)

Camera angle, STEPS (did you not hear that the first time?), leaning
down in the first photo. Geez. Go drink your kool aide.


So you are going with the best case scenario? That FOX didn't doctor the
picture but chose the one out of hundreds that flattered Bush even though it
misrepresented his relative height.

Question for you: What's up with all the "kool aide" references I see
scattered about the newsgroups these days? What's the origin?