On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 01:02:48 -0400, Jeff Harper wrote:

"Larry Bud" wrote in message
om...

Two DIFFERENT photos, taken at two different instances. Put them side
by side and see the difference. In one photo Kerry is talking, Bush
has his mouth closed, and in the the other Kerry has his mouth half
way closed, and Bush is talking.

At best, FOX chose the photo most flattering to Bush, despite the fact that
it gave an unrealistic impression.

What's unrealistic about a camera angle? Why do you care who looks
taller? You know what? Until this came up, I had no clue how tall
either of them were, let alone in relation to the other. That's
because _it doesn't matter_ unless you're all about style over
content. I can see why Kerry supporters would worry about
something like this that doesn't matter (it's all you've got to
work with), but don't project your personal failings to care about
things that matter onto the rest of us. It's not a faked photo,

At worse, they used a doctored photo.

It's not. Yet your type will say "Even though the documents are
forgeries, let's talk about what they said anyway".

(Yes, the two photos are different,
but how do you explain the fact that Bush is so tall in the FOX photo?)

Please to be googling for the word "parallax". Get back to us once
you understand it. You must have encountered it at some point in your
life.