View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
Dave Balderstone
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 1096685252.C1t5VLwV5j0MUbXPnNrSnA@teranews, Mark & Juanita
wrote:

This is one of the reasons rec.ww has never split, there has yet been no
clear identification of a split hierarchy that would not result in multiple
posts, dilution of effectiveness, or efficiency of reading


Out of pure curiosity, does anyone know why the turning group ended up
in rec.crafts rather than rec?

Is there a puky duck factor at play?