On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:15:12 -0500, "Bob Schmall"
wrote:




..or maybe they had the stones to admit an error publicly.


Then I'd wonder why they name TB III as "Top Dog" with their Numero
Uno logo. If their testing methodology is flawed - then redo all of
the samples against a new methodology. Or stick by your tests - if
their sound, if all samples were treated identically, why capitulate?

Not to prolong this - but I didn't get that vibe at all.
Obviously it's subjective - others may laud their approach.

And, in any case, I've been using TB III on my projects... ;-