"patrick conroy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:50:44 -0400, Mark Blum
wrote:

pressure they received from Titebond's company, since they are an
advertiser. Did anybody else get a weird vibe on the article?

Yeah - me!

It was *odd*. It struck me as a complete back-down, a complete
capitulation. Not even the editorial-nads to stand by their testing. I
read it as they defer to the other labs work and then call it "Top
Choice".

...or maybe they had the stones to admit an error publicly.

Bob