"Swingman"
"Fletis Humplebacker"
"Swingman"

The question should never have been presented, and continued, as one of
"intelligence", but of "ignorance" instead.


Must be something in the sawdust, because not many here, even those
rabidly
pro-Bush, seem to be able to grasp that simple fact, or differentiate
between the two.


I believe most here were responding to the debate over his intelligence
because that's what was presented.


Yep, you got that right, Festus ... it seems that is _exactly_ what I was
taking issue with, huh?.



No, you were sniveling that the debate wasn't about something else
instead of presenting the something else. That's the point. And the
name is Fletis, not Festus. Read more slowly if necessary. I didn't question
what you responded to I questioned your reasoning. How did that escape you?


Whether you feel it was a misguided
argument is irrelevent.

And to prove my point, your "irrelevent" above simply shows your ignorance,
not your intelligence.


It was irrelevent to you because you are apparently too enamored with yourself
to understand the point. If you had a more relevent argument to make you
should have made it instead of sniveling about it being presented wrong,
while pretending to have some measure of superior intellect.



What's _is_ relevant is that only the ignorant would opine that the
difference between "intelligence" and "ignorance" is irrelevant.


Do you ever have anything substantive to offer or is this about it ? Someone
can be intelligent but be ignorant of quite a bit if they choose not to exercise
their intellect, which was the point being made. I think your ignorance has more
to do with genetics than habit.