Thread: IMM fodder
View Single Post
  #202   Report Post  
geoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default IMM fodder

In message , IMM
writes
Well Kelly said they can do it in days.


So where are they?


Are you really so stupid. They have the know-how to do it very quickly,
that was certain.


What, build chem, bio or nuclear WMD from scratch?

I don't think so


A great many "experts " were convinced that they existed, Now most of
them are doing an abrupt about turn


Kelly said differently.

We gave them six months notice of
inspection, so they hid/got rid of things.


But the whole country is available to inspect and they have been
searching hard since they invaded


So they got rid before the invasion. or hid them in the desert. Ever been
to a desert?


I have actually, several.

You can't for example, just hide biological weapons in the sand, they
degrade

There is no evidence that he had any fissile material for nuclear
weapons

Tomorrow, I hope to be able to refute the existence of bio, chem and
nuclear capabilities


They still had the know-how
which is the main point, not the hardware.


45 minutes you moron - that's what the man said. That was the basis for
going to war


It was not. read my other post of this. Thicko moron. You lack simple
logic.


I'm not interested in your other posts, the time stated by Bliar was 45
minutes, it's on record for all to see


IMM, when even George Bush is questioning the existence of WMD
(Elections are coming up, of course), it's only blind fools like you

who
repeat ssuch idiotic mantras

It is not me saying that. I only repeat what experts say. Kelly was an
expert who had been to Iraq over 40 times. Bush has distanced himself

from
the intelligence people for political reasons, who furnished him, and the
British, with the findings. He is letting them take a fall. There is no
need for him to do that as the Iraqies had the potential to have WMD

within
days.

The point is that they had the potential to ramp up WMD within days.

Kelly
said so. It is very simple.


"They still have the know-how, which is the main point, not the
hardware" ... in case you've totally lost the plot, it's what you said a
few lines above. Do you have the faintest idea how long it takes to turn
know-how without the hardware into a real WMD - be it bio, chem, or
nuclear. Obviously not since you said "The point is that they had the
potential to ramp up WMD within days"


Kelly said "days". YES DAYS!!!!!!! He said week then days, which mean less
than 7. Are you that thick!


Again, I'm talking about what Bliar said - it was his justification for
going to war


They DID have them, that is for certain. They used them, that is for
certain. They could deploy them within days, that's is for certain.


He had some nerve gas which he had the capabilities to deliver over
short distances. He did not have the delivery systems to do what Bliar
quoted

At the time of these gas attacks, we and the US were supporting him


Where are they? Who knows. They did have them and could deploy them within
days. Then there is point of supporting terrorist groups.


Al qaeda and Saddam were not bedfellows. There is no evidence to suggest
that Iraq have attempted to export or train terrorists.

Maybe you would
think differently of a plane or two smashed into bocks in London.

I think you are referring to Saudis there

You seem to have swallowed hook line and sinker, the story put about as
an excuse to invade Iraq. You don't seem able to separate the WTC
attacks from Saddam Hussein

just come up on the TV - "How Bush and Bliar got it wrong" Saturday Ch4
at 7pm. Watch it, you might learn something

--
geoff