On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:13:46 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:49:07 GMT, ah wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:38:58 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:09:45 GMT, ah wrote:

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:42:24 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 02:02:13 GMT, ah wrote:

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:35:01 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:54:46 GMT, ah wrote:

Yet you earlier conceeded the bottleneck . . . ?

With my old card yes. But the bottleneck was with the PCI slot it was in, not the IDE part.

Have you made an real-life comparison?

Yes or no.

Well put it this way. I'm no longer punching the screen waiting for the ****ing disks to catch up.

Evasion noted.

I did smash a keyboard to pieces this morning when the ADSL conked out though.

No evasion, I prefer actual performance in-use, not some silly meaningless number from a benchmark.

Stop wriggling!

What?

Your .sig is too wide for demon.local

Good.

Bad.

That wasn't a very well thought out reply.

The logic was sound.
--
ah