On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:53:13 +0100, "IMM" wrote:
18019 litres/min is not bad at all amnd will fill a bath pronto.
It would be outstanding,
I don't think he wants, or needs, firehose volumes and pressures.
I'm sure. So your suggestion of over 18000 lpm is perhaps a touch on
the high side?
He is after a combi, no condensing combi I know eliminates the plume.
There is, however a range of effects.
Even a conventional boiler will produce a plume on cold dry days.
Only slight.
It can be only slight with a modern design of condensing boiler
especially on a longer flue, and in any case I suggested ways to
address any pluming issue.
The storage capacity is very limited as was demonstrated last week.
You never.
Would you like me to post a link to the thread where the numbers were
calculated?
100 litres is the average bath size.
It's a small bath.
100 litres is the average bath size!!!!!
It may be for you, but as I say, I am not getting into a pantomime
argument with Widow Twankey.
Average shower of 7 - 8 litres/minute at approx 40C.
That is not an average shower at all.
It is an average shower!!!!!!!!!
Again, it may be for you, etc. etc.
So 2 showers will take
15 litres of mixed water.
It needs at least twice that.
So 2 showers will take 15 litres of mixed water!!!!!!!!!!
No, that's one.
The poster
is attempting gain information to make a
reasoned decision. The last thing
he needs is misinformation from an amateur.
So why are you giving it?
Because I know what I am on about and you clearly do not.
Uh huh.
..andy
To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
|