On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:50:01 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:10:26 GMT, ah wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:01:16 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:19:49 GMT, ah wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:38:37 +0100, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:37:25 GMT, ah wrote:
I'm making the switch when I can . . . it's the only bottleneck I know.
A real ****er, if you ask me.
Switching TO scsi?
Correct.
Why bother? It's not all it's hyped up to be. Just get more IDE.
S'posed to be more responsive,
The IDE raid card I bought has all the SCSI personalities built in.
Honda has a car with Farrari personality built-in, to . . . .
and imbued with greater longevity....
How does an interface make the spindle last longer?
SCSI is a dying breed. SATA or firewire or something, that's what you want.
Got it; still a heck of a neck on that bottle.
--
ah
|