"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:59:29 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:57:06 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message

I notice that as usual, you didn't mention any of the disadvantages
of
these materials such as the effects of insect and rodent
infestation.

On SIPs? Please give examples. It is best you stop making things up.


I never do that.

www.huduser.org/publications/wpd/finalrpt.wp5

"One potential disadvantage is that foam core panels are susceptible
to tunneling by termites, carpenter ants, and rodents that can destroy
the structural integrity of the assembly. This is especially
troublesome because the tunnels are difficult to detect. Where
termites pose a threat, standard preventive measures should be used
such as soil treatment or termite shields. At least one panel
manufacturer has incorporated borate into their expanded polystyrene
core as an insect repellent, but the effectiveness is not
well-documented to date. Apparently other foam materials are not as
receptive to treatment. "


Other integrity problems as well.

http://www.sipweb.com/2001-10_juneau.pdf

The houses built in Alaska were not errected correctly. The problems were
nothing to do with the SIP panles themselves. If you poorly errect any
house
of any contruction you will have problems.

A Google will bring out the results of the Alaska failures.

....Any more tripe?

The point is that they are subject to
problems depending on climate
and depending on how they are
used and by whom.

You are a full mentalist! That is clear.

The problem was due to the panels not being erected properly, NOT usage,
climate or by whoever lived or walked in and out them. Boy oh boy!