"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
IMM wrote:

My God not another one!!!! You can get 22 litres/minute from combi's.
You
can also get 9 litres/min, which you seem to think all are like that.

Two points:

You can get 180 mph from a saloon car... is yours that quick? What you
fail to allow for (yet again) is the fact that you can get 22lpm from a
combi is not relevant. Most peoples experiance is of far more modest
combis. That is because that is what tends to get recommended and
installed by their plumbers, and that is what most people are prepared
to pay for. Many people I have spoken to would not even be able to tell
you the input power of the combi they have!

Note also he did say the flow rates are "a bit poor" - not "very poor"
or "inadequate". For somone used to a good storage system 22 lpm *is* a
bit poor in comparison.

You have contradicted what you have said above when you said they have
poor
flowrates.

I suggest you go and re-read the thread.

I tend not to respond to wilful misunderstandings - thanks for doing it for
me! Quite, quite and quite (to your points). I meant (and you, at least,
could clearly understand) that I had only found adequate flow rates from
rather large combis that would be impractical to install in my/most home(s).
In their place (for example a restored listed building rented out where a
"conventional" system was undesirable and the *large* combi could be put
outside) it did a fine job.


--
Bob Mannix
(anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not)