On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:36:48 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

Who _cares_? If some people don't like the Wreck and want a
different group, let them create it. Why is everyone so against
this new group, anyway? If they don't like it, they won't even
freakin' BE there. It's not like it would be taking anything
away from the Wreck, and anyone could visit both forums if they
chose to do so. What's the problem?

Whadda buncha maroons.


-------------------------------------------------------
Have you read the new book "What Would Machiavelli Do?"
----------------------------
http://diversify.com Dynamic, Interactive Websites!
--------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

I was strongly considering an "abstain" but after reading Robert Bonomi's
addendum/correction to the explanation of what is required to pass the proposal,
I'll abstain from abstaining and just ignore the entire thing. No need for my
"abstention" to require two additional "Yes" votes to pass something I don't
care about, either way, anyway.

If they, whoever "they" might be, want to create another group, separate and
independent of the Wreck, who am I, as a completely disinterested party, to say
"No". From that point of view,seems like 'twould be best for me to just ignore
the whole shenanigan.

Unless of course, I've missed some ramification of the process and need to be
educated on the same.

But, on the other hand, a "Yes" might help those with chronic underwear waditis
find some relief. Has anyone made a study of what percentage of OT posts/threads
are posts/threads whining about OT posts/threads?

Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA