On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:34:24 -0500, (Jedd Haas) wrote:

You can debate the woman and what she did all you like. That's not the
point. The point is Bush's gratuitous cruelty.

So far all you Bush fans haven't rebutted that central thesis. Indeed, the
public record makes Bush's nasty side easily discernible.

If he were just another drunk village idiot, no one would care. But since
he's armed with WMD, his gratuitous cruelty is clearly a menace.

Frankly...I dont see it as cruel. Direct, nasty and well deserved.

But Jeff..if someone hurts one of your people, after TEOTWAKI...lets
see if you do them in with a dispassionate and somber mindset.

You Dems really really are having to grasp at anything, arent you?

This is rather pathetic actually. Shrug..be a mensch. Next time you
want to win a presidency..try running someone with a hell of lot fewer
skeletons in the closet, and with a clear plan other than..."Im anyone
but Bush" and has the good sense, that if he is gonna use something
other than his voting record..that is really means something.

Try Mother Theresa. Hummmm she is dead. No matter..so is Kerry's shot
at the Whitehouse.

Right along with CBS/Dan Rathers reputation. One neither will ever
outlive.

Gunner

"In my humble opinion, the petty carping levied against Bush by
the Democrats proves again, it is better to have your eye plucked
out by an eagle than to be nibbled to death by ducks." - Norman
Liebmann