View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Jack Casuso
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, hadn't heard about the recall. Checked my model number, and called
them. Absolutely no hassle, sending everything right out.

"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Russ wrote:

Rebuilding an old saw that was given to me. Can someone provide me with
sizes (LxWxH) for these pieces:

Rear table (PN: 63675)
Spacer board (PN: 63429)
Rip fence (PN: 63432)
Front table (PN: 63674)


You might want to go over to

http://www.radialarmsawrecall.com/index2.htm
and plug in your model and serial numbers. The number you gave is one for
which there is an upgrade kit available--that includes a new guard that is
a significant improvement over the old one and a new table. No rip fence
though. The recall is free, so you can't beat the price.

Unless you're trying to rebuild it to museum quality just take any sturdy
board for the fence--the fence on a radial saw is disposable. I usually
use a 1x2 or 1x3 or scrap of MDF, but sometimes use a heavier one if I

need
to attach hold-downs or some other kind of fixturing to it.

The dimensions of the new table are different from the original. I put a
new table copied from the original on mine (I have the same model) before

I
became aware of the recall. The dimensions are 40 inches wide, with the
rear table, spacer board, and front table 2, 8-3/4, and 19 inches deep

give
or take a fraction. If you need it to the nearest 16th I think I still
have the original on the scrap pile somewhere, but it will likely take

some
digging to find all three pieces.

If you don't have the Jon Eakes book on tuning radial saws

http://www.wired-2-shop.com/joneakes...=3&nPrdImageID
=&CatID=3,
it's worth the price, and if you don't have the Mr. Sawdust book
http://www.mrsawdust.com/index.php you should get that as well.

The original table was 1" particle board, the new one is 1" MDF. The MDF

is
much more satisfactory. Mr. Sawdust tells how to make an improved
table--you might want to read that before you start.



Thanks!


--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)