On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 05:04:39 GMT, no spam wrote:

On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:11:27 GMT, "127.0.0.1" loopy@localhost wrote:


"no spam" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:19:51 GMT, "127.0.0.1" loopy@localhost wrote:
Yes, please remember you have legal recourse if you've died in a fire.

Might have been personal.

if one has time to make a call during a fire, one has time to remove oneself
from harms way.
and yes, surviving families do file law suites when a fire department bares
prejudice on individual homes.

not sure what you are uptight about. a non-pedo who tells his neighbors that
he is one isn't as nearly as bad as a pedo who claims the opposite.

i'm not one to propose the scarlet letter laws...

-a|ex

However, your original point was:
all i see is someone spreading a rumour to keep out the kidz, but in the
case of a fire.
i doubt very much if the volunteers will ask if that address belongs to a
pedo when they are dispatched.
remember, there are law suites if personal malice is involved.

-a|ex

I love to be pedantic but...where did it say that the person with the
house on fire would always do the phoning for help? For example,
neighbors and people passing by would probably call the fire
department (at least in this area) if they noticed a fire.

People can sleep through fires don't you know - deep sleep,
unconscious drunk or whatever until/after it's too late.

Read my post again - I didn't mention anything about pedo/non-pedo -
seems you are making up something just so you can argue with it. Are
you seeing pink elephants this evening as well?


Private Pyle, what on earth on you trying to do
to my beloved Corps?? You wanna be different,
don;t you Pyle?