View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Greg
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THe flaw in your argument is that there is no place that is totally safe from
natural disasters and the folks who think they are safe are more likely NOT to
have any insurance for it.
I agree there should be places where folks would have to accept their losses
(river bottoms and barrier islands) if they rebuild but you can't paint this
with too wide a brush.