Old Nick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 09:51:38 -0500, Gerald Ross
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Old Nick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 11:23:33 GMT, "Dave jackson"
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

I wish they said how ell it works....

Theoretically it is a standard hearing protector with a microphone and
speakers in each earmuff which shuts off at 85 db leaving just the
hearing protector.

Yeah, that's fine. But how good is the passive hearing protection?

Not as good noise attenuation as with my old cheap WalMart earmuff
protectors.
Plus at times I had to reach up and turn off the microphone to get that.
Plus with the batteries it is heavier.


Mine works poorly, failing to shut off a lot of the time. At low dB it
lets you hear conversation or the radio, but sounds extremely cheap and
tinny. Got mine as a gift and will sell it cheap.

My hearing is _extremely dear_ to me (now that it's a bit too late :-
)
************************************************** ***
the snappy ones are the best


--

Gerald Ross, Cochran, GA
To reply add the numerals "13" before the "at"
............................................
Phobia: what's left after drinking 2
out of a 6 pack




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----