"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:06:30 -0000, "IMM" wrote:
"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:34:44 -0000, "IMM" wrote:
You missed it again. It is not a mater of either or. It is cheap to
pack
the loft full of insulation and super easy to do so. So do it. The
walls
leaking heat is another matter, and of course should be tackled
eventually.
To do the walls is not easy and expensive. because the walls leak
heat
more
than the loft does not mean you ignore the loft, or insulate it to the
level
of then walls.
That's exactly what I'm saying.
You have totally missed it! Wow!
There is very little point in reducing the U value for the roof below
0.25 in the context of that.
Missed it again. Look back at my post the upper floor/loft ceilings
having a large area. That is half the house.
If you think that, there is something wrong with your arithmetic.
A lot is right with the logic though.
---
--
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 14/01/2004