On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:40:21 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:52:22 +0100, "IMM" wrote:



You turkey I am not about an expensive modulating boiler - for about
the
50th time. You are hard of thinking.

The conclusion was around a modulating boiler several posts before you
introduced this wild goose chase.

No! You were on about a modulating boiler, no one else.



From the OP, (and I quote):

"It looks like the answer is a Worcester Greenstar running vented into
a direct heatbank with a zone valve for the rads and a second zone
valve for the towel rails and airing cupboard rad."


Now let me see.... Hmmm......

Looking at the technical specification of the Worcester Greenstar, it
says that the output to central heating is from 7.4 to 28.8kW.
This sounds awfully like modulating to me......

Who was it that you were saying wasn't reading and paying attention?

W-B tech people say the "heating" boiler can deliver a constant temp. I know
I have recently put one in and used a late heat exchanger on the red return
to lower the return temp. It works wonderfully.

The ideal heating boiler has some of the flow/ret sensors taken off.



I am sure it *can*, but why screw up a perfectly good and efficient
modulating boiler and wreck its efficiency?

Where did you install this claimed boiler?

I think that you are making this up as you go along......




..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl