Thread: Premium Bonds
View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Robin Robin is offline
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,681
Default Premium Bonds

On 06/06/2021 22:55, John Rumm wrote:
On 06/06/2021 22:27, Robin wrote:
On 06/06/2021 20:38, John Rumm wrote:
On 05/06/2021 21:59, Robin wrote:
On 05/06/2021 21:14, John Rumm wrote:
On 05/06/2021 16:22, Andy Bennet wrote:
On 05/06/2021 15:56, Peter Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 12:52:58 +0100, "Jim GM4DHJ ..."

Well that is five £25 wins in five months since I this
normal ?

Depends how big your holding is, I'd say,


and how recently it was


Recent purchases win more often than older ones because
there are more of them, so a large holding purchased in the last 12
months will produce more winners than a similarly large holding
purchased, say, five or ten years ago.

Complete garbage. Each bond has exactly the same probability of
winning regardless of when it was purchased.

I suspect the logic is that it has the same chance of winning as
any other bond. However as the total number of bonds issued
increases, the chances of any bond winning gets smaller. e.g. if
you bought 10K bonds when there were 10M issued, you would be more
likely to win than if you bought 10K when there were 100M issued.

I think not...

(I presume they adjust the payout from time to time to accommodate
that and the fluctuating returns they get investing the money)

...because your presumption is not correct.

erm, I think you just confirmed my presumption *is* correct - they do
adjust the payout to account for the changing number of active bonds.


And no

I should have made clear I was contesting your "from time to time".
That¬* seemed to me to imply possible delay between changes in the
total number of bonds and changes in the prize fund.

Actually I was just highligting that I have not looked at the details in
a very long time (not held any bonds for 20 years) - so I did not know
what frequency they did the adjustments at.

Indeed, without such delay I don't see how you can get the result you
predicted ("if you bought 10K bonds when there were 10M issued, you
would be more likely to win than if you bought 10K when there were
100M issued").¬* A result that is prevented by the month by month

Indeed - I was not suggesting that the claims that more recent ones are
more likely to win was actually correct - only suggesting a mechanism
that some might imaginine that would allow this to be true (hence the "I
suspect the logic is that"). Apologies if I did not express that very well.

Ah, I see. My mistake. I had thought that Jove had nodded. (As in you
thought that logic was reality.) I should have known better. Sorry.

reply-to address is (intended to be) valid