On Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:07:32 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
T i m wrote:
Ok, yes, you have quoted one of the scenarios where animals working
with humans is likely to be the least of the issues (of course you
would) but what YOU might need to consider is just how we might
normally get an animal to do what *we want* when it might not want to.

Love the Utopia you obviously inhabit if you think only animals have to be
'trained' to do what 'we' want.

DickHeadxx, is that you again? I love this as a way of trying to
justify the incomparable and the illogical. ;-)

Where the fcuk did you get the idea that that's what I might think
from, other than your own misconceptions (now I'm sure it's
DickHeadxx)! And using the left brainer / troll 'everything has to be
black or white' in the attempt to make a point?

Every kid gets trained in the same way to do what his parents want.

Ah, with sticks, chains and electric prods? Or 'rewards' like it can
eat if it does something not natural to it as a species?

eg. Animals don't typically use their power of smell for us, they have
and use it for themselves to sniff out food / prey, territory or
aggressors etc.

Many
animals too, by their parents.

Of course, training by their own species to do the things natural to
their own species. We call that 'natural'.

Training a horse to pull a cart isn't training it to what it would
*ever* do in the wild.

DickHeadXX mode on I'm going to train a parrot to sound like a car
alarm and keep it chained under the bonnet of my car. It will be fine
to do that because 1) I'm a god and 2) It's not specifically illegal
(I'll give it food and water 'obviously) and 3) I can. DickHeadxx
mode off

Cheers, T i m