On 04/06/2021 15:26, T i m wrote:
Spike wrote:

On 04/06/2021 13:48, T i m wrote:
Tim Streater wrote:

T r o l l insisting that certain people have "never helped me" is another
example of his ********.

Aww bless. Touched another nerve have I?

What has usually happened is that true, relevant, and
correct advice has been offered but it has been ignored.

See, just because you are a simple Goblin you may get confused with
what you think might be considered help and what actually *helps*.

I see that you seem to have forgotten already about us putting you right
over your 'meat eating causes antibiotic resistance in viruses' blunder.

You really are weird aren't you.

It's not me that's defending the indefensible, it's *you* that's doing so.

Let me put some real perspective on all that:

That'll be a first.

I *added* when I didn't need to, the word 'virus' to the 'antibiotic
resistance' thing.

So, you have only yourself to blame for your error.

Some left brainers thought I intentionally said 'virus' when I didn't
mean 'virus' and repeatedly corrected my 'error' because they were 1)
trolls and 2) considered it important when it patently wasn't.

Wriggle, wriggle.

Have you read what you just wrote?

T i m : "Some thought I intentionally said 'virus' when I didn't mean
'virus' "

So how is anyone supposed to know that? This is a text medium and not a
telepathic one. That's the most pathetic excuse I've heard in a long
time and about as transparent as a toddler's excuses for staying up late.

But then, after blaming 'trolls' for putting right your error, you then
went on to say:

T i m : "...some considered it important when it patently wasn't".

Since viruses don't respond to antibiotics and therefore can't become
resistant to them, it is *patently* *obvious* that this is the *crucial*
*point*.

So, the first person to correct that might have counted as 'helping',
had it been considered an issue and it wasn't to 'most people'.

The fact that the trolls tried to make something out of nothing only
indicates just how little real counter argument they / you have.

The fact that you carried on defending the indefensible, as you are
continuing to do so now, suggests a certain level of narcissistic
behaviour on your part. You are never wrong, the sun shines out of your
arse, you are the Custodian of The One True Way, everybody else is
conditioned in the wrong way, if only we could see your bigger picture.
Sheesh, you're just a puffed-up, self-important, gullible fool that's
managed to alienate a whole group against you and from which you've
converted *no-one* at all by your latest anti-meat-eating crusade thinly
disguised under the convenient mantles of evangelical veganism and
concern for animals.


--
Spike