On 03/06/2021 10:10, T i m wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:33:46 +0100, John Rumm
wrote:

snip

I could ... but only when everyone 'else' applies / abides to the
netettiquite etc. That's only fair isn't it?

There are few others that appear to have a similar level of "on message"
dedication to a cause... the only ones that spring to mind are peeler in
his obsession with speed, and normen knobend and his anonymous mate who
have a similar zeal for posting anti-semetic rants (if that is indeed
what they are - its hard to make much sense of them and I am long past
caring).

snip

OK. Bottom line. You consider it acceptable to cause animals to suffer
and be killed (because that's what your consumption of meat, eggs and
dairy requires) and you are obviously happy with that.

You really haven't learnt have you?

It's ironic that you do nothing to stop animal suffering. And against
ethical veganism you still keep pets and subject them to cruel practices.

Suffering doesn't automatically follow meat or meat product consumption.
Only in the mind of a fanatic can that be possible.

Yes, most of us are happy for ourselves and our loved ones to enjoy a
natural balanced diet.