"T i m" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 25 May 2021 08:47:44 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:



"T i m" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 24 May 2021 15:50:11 +0100, bert wrote:

snip

It's *not* part of a 'natural diet' when the animal has been created
unnaturally, kept unnaturally, fed unnaturally (high protein foods
making them gain meat mass in very short periods so their bones
collapse as they haven't grown as fast) and kill unnaturally (with no
hope of escape or defending itself) and comes full of chemicals that
would never occur in nature and that are making viruses that are
lethal to mankind antibiotic resistant.


All viruses are antibiotic resistant.

But are becoming more so because of or exposure to antibiotics in
meat.

Nope, that's bacteria, not viruses

Whatever.

Pathetic.

and there are no antibiotics in my meat.

So do you know that whatever meat you are eating
has never either routinely or as result of a medical
issue hasn't been administered some antibiotic?

Yep.

https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-...tic-resistance

Doesn't happen with the meat I eat.

The thing is, when this is done to livestock (and it is),

Not with the meat I eat.

there is often a 'safe period' after the antibiotic was administered
and the animal deemed 'safe' to slaughter for meat, but that's only a
'maximum safe limit', not that there is none left in their system at all.

Wrong with the meat I eat.