On 11 May 2021 17:34:52 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 11 May 2021 at 10:19:32 BST, T r o l l wrote:

On 10 May 2021 22:09:54 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

Restoring what T r o l l snipped:

Do I conclude from this strange outburst that you think that human milk
*doesn't* contain lactose?

Pull yourself together before you burst a blood vessel.

snip
Probably yes, given you have pretty well everything else wrong. And
isn't that old strawman getting tired now?

From the Wikipedia article on Lactose:

"Infant mammals nurse on their mothers to drink milk, which is rich in
lactose."

Yes, and?

And this is direct evidence that you have trouble with facts: on the one hand
you "probably" agree that you don't think human milk contains lactose, and
when I quote an article stating that it does, in fact, contain lactose (as all
mammalian milk does), all you can say is "Yes, and?".

Because you were 1) stating something I already knew and 2) therefore
it was already understood but discarded BECAUSE IT WAS IRELLEVENT.

You have lost the plot mate. Are you really so desperate to prove some
strawman point (because you realise it's the only (non point) you
have) that you have keep repeating the same BS? (I know the answer of
course, you are a left brainer, sense you are on a sticky wicket and
so are desperate to prove *anything*. It must be so frustrating for
you that you can't.

I wouldn't have believed it possible if I hadn't seen it in black and white.

You won't believe any fact, even if it is in black and white, if it
doesn't fit your prior understanding (even if they are bogus
assumptions and misunderstandings on your part). It's call cognitive
bias and a classic symptom of a sad left brainer troll. ;-(

Is it because you have the attention span of a gnat?

Is you problem because you can't deal with anything other than your
own presumptions?

Ok, I'll repeat for the hard of thinking, the 'importance' of infants
having lactose tolerance and that tolerance being more likely to be
maintained in adulthood by them continuing to consume milk after they
have weaned ... has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER with *adults* drinking milk
(cow or human) after they are weaned.

It's not that those people can.

It's not that those people are.

It's that those people are weird. There is no NEED for an adult human
to drink adult human breast milk, after they have weaned', full stop.
To make matters worse, they do it at the ultimate cost to the animal
it was actually produced for and to us re the resources (800 gallons
of water to produce 1 gallon of milk, compared with 200g for the plant
based alternatives), the GH gases, the pollution and the habitat
destruction.

It's even weirder therefore that they choose to drink cows breast milk
after they have weaned.

That is the point. Anything else is just strawman bollox.

Did you know they marketed milk hard because it was either make us
drink it (give it free to children to get them hooked on the fats like
some creepy drug dealer) or tip it down the drain?

Cheers, T i m