On 10 May 2021 16:10:58 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 07 May 2021 at 18:37:19 BST, T i m wrote:

On 7 May 2021 16:25:36 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 07 May 2021 at 17:19:04 BST, newshound
wrote:

On 07/05/2021 12:13, T i m wrote:

However, what we are doing then is comparing the taste of something we
are used to, something we shouldn't have been consuming in the first
place ('cows milk' was meant for 'cows', not humans

But humans have *evolved* to be able to consume it (at least, a lot
can). So how do you justify that statement?

He can't, beacuse what humans and other mammals have done is evolve to consume
milk - full stop.

Bwhahahahaa ... stupid Goblin, like you would have a clue about any of
this, ...

Considerably more than you, obviously.

Oh, you are funny Goblin, please keep it up!

Human milk has a different make-up to cows milk, but both
contain lactose.

Doh, strange that a lot more than 60% of the population aren't
intolerant to the milk from their same *SPECIES* you weird freak!

Do I conclude from this strange outburst that you think that human milk
*doesn't* contain lactose?

Probably yes, given you have pretty well everything else wrong. And
isn't that old strawman getting tired now?

Or that you're unaware of why a large proportion of
adults have no trouble drinking cows milk.

It's funny isn't it, how you can rate 40% of the population as large,
especially given how long it's taken for us to get there. How many
thousand years of adults drinking the growth fluid milk meant for
babies of a different species and only 40% of the world population can
cope with the stuff. And none of that stands out as being 'strange' to
you does it?

ps. Infant *milk allergies* are rarely any form of lactose intolerance
and only one in 50 have it. *Massive* difference to adult lactose
intolerance levels of over 1 in 2.

The geographical spread of those adults who are tolerant/intolerant to lactose
has already been explained.

Oh, 'explained' like I, (the one who *doesn't* exploit animals of the
two of us), doesn't already know? This is the thing with left
brainers, they stumble though their black and white life without any
knowledge what so ever of what anyone else might already know.

And it's just as well infants are tolerant of
lactose, wouldn't you say?

Of course I would but still a completely (and so irrelevant) to the
point that we were never calves *ever* and so should *never* (as in
*ever*) been drinking the growth fluid of our own species, let alone a
completely different one (it's not even an ape, it's a fecking
herbivore bovine FFS) after we have weaned!!!!!

We aren't talking about if it's 'natural' to slice potatoes up into
wafers and fry them in oil, we are talking about denying the young of
another species it's natural mothers growth fluid by killing it and
taking it for ourselves?

You have no ability to even start to realise how fcuked up that is
because you are 1) a left brainer (so can never change you view on
anything) 2) are indoctrinated and 3), think you still need to do
stiff like drink the growth fluid of another species to *survive*?

No, you keep sucking on that cow teat baby Goblin ...

Cheers, T i m