Thread: Spank!
View Single Post
  #459   Report Post  
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
Snit[_3_] Snit[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,086
Default Spank!

On May 7, 2021 at 9:54:27 PM MST, "Snit" wrote
:

On May 7, 2021 at 8:22:49 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 7:13:46 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.
But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.
You reject evidence

You presented no evidence what so ever.


Happy to:

http://climate.nasa.gov
https://www.newscientist.com/article-topic/climate-change/
https://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/
https://climatecrocks.com/
https://insideclimatenews.org/
https://www.climatecentral.org/
https://www.who.int/health-topics/climate-change#tab=tab_1
https://www.historicalclimatology.com/features
https://skepticalscience.com/
https://whistleblower.org/climate-science-watch/
https://grist.org/
https://climatenexus.org/
https://www.dailyclimate.org/
https://www.theclimategroup.org/
https://www.realclimate.org/


Thats no evidence that man has destroyed
more ecosystems than the ice ages did.

We can also look at peer reviewed articles:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=climate+change


Reviewed by other MMGCC cult members. Pass.

Lots more.


Yep, endless **** spewed by the MMGCC cult.

Yes, agriculture likely did have some effect on
world climate, but we survived that fine anyway.

No need to hyperventilate, stupid.

reams of your MMGCC **** flushed where it belongs


As I said, you reject evidence and prefer ignorance. That is your choice.


You responded by saying you will agree evidence. Why do you keep saying it.
OK, you like ignorance. Whatever.

If you find a counter from an internationally recognized scientific group
please share.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.