On May 7, 2021 at 7:13:46 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence

You presented no evidence what so ever.


Happy to:

http://climate.nasa.gov
https://www.newscientist.com/article-topic/climate-change/
https://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/
https://climatecrocks.com/
https://insideclimatenews.org/
https://www.climatecentral.org/
https://www.who.int/health-topics/climate-change#tab=tab_1
https://www.historicalclimatology.com/features
https://skepticalscience.com/
https://whistleblower.org/climate-science-watch/
https://grist.org/
https://climatenexus.org/
https://www.dailyclimate.org/
https://www.theclimategroup.org/
https://www.realclimate.org/

We can also look at peer reviewed articles:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=climate+change

Lots more. But here is the thing -- you have already made up your mind that
you wish to reject evidence. It is predictable you will. Seeing evidence will
not change your view because you have made it clear you are immune to
evidence.

Nothing about this is complex.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.