On 7 May 2021 13:44:14 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 07 May 2021 at 13:18:43 BST, williamwright wrote:

On 07/05/2021 11:31, T r o l l wrote:

Once you have undone all the indoctrination you (we) have been
subjected to for (for most here), many many years you should be able
to see it for the weird behaviour that it has always been.

I'm a member of a species that has co-existed with farm animals for
millennia. That's not indoctrination, it's the natural world as it's
evolved.

I suspect if T r o l l tried to discuss these views with humans from say 20k
years ago, the response would be short, sharp, and stone-age.

I wouldn't be doing so if we were trying to *SURVIVE* you stupid
Goblin.

He quotes 65% of the population as lactose intolerant. I assume he means the
world population,

Doh!. No, I mean 60% of my local pub or your asylum. rolls eyes

since such a number certainly wouldn't apply to just this
country.

No **** sherlock.

Here, we are in the group that is mostly lactose tolerant.

And in other countries / cultures (that think drinking a mothers milk
after you have weaned to be weird) have much greater levels of lactose
intolerance.

https://milk.procon.org/lactose-intolerance-by-country/

And from
what I recall, it's not that the others are intolerant per se, just that their
cultures don't include drinking cows milk later in life.

Bwhaha ... (you are funny).

But ours does, and so
we stay tolerant to it.

Only those who have gained that 'tolerance (to something we shouldn't
have been consuming in the first place) by long term exposure to it.
Hardly an indicator that we were *meant* to consume it eh freak?

This is because if you drink cows milk as a child, and
then stop, the body loses the ability to produce lactase, the enzyme that can
break down lactose, the sugar in milk. Drinking milk as adults is part of our
culture, so talking about intolerance is ********.

Aw bless, the stupid goblin tries to conflate science and biology with
culture. Awww ...

Lactase is found in other mammals than humans. We are all born with the
ability to produce it - wouldn't be able to digest human milk otherwise.

Yes, *before we wean' you cow nipple sucking weirdo!

Occasionally you see animals sucking offspring of other species; usually the
latter are orphans.

'Occasional ... so even less than the 40% then? It's the exception
that proves the rule to you does it (I suppose it would if you are
desperately trying to justify your position).

Prhaps T r o l l needs to go have a word with them about
it.

Yeah, of course, because in the world of a sick Goblin desperately
trying to substantiate it's disgusting habit ... they will suddenly
gain the powers of speech?

No, we may have taken the surplus milk from a cow at some point in our
past TO SURVIVE but outside of that, the idea is still *disgusting* to
a very large percentage of the world population ... and I'm not even
talking about the many million who agree (but aren't vegan) and have
moved onto alternative milks that are no only more 'natural' (they
aren't the growth fluid for a different species) but cause fewer
health issues, are more sustainable, far less cruel, create less
pollution, create fewer greenhouse gasses, use far less water and are
more sustainable.

But you carry on sucking on that cows teat baby! ;-)

Cheers, T i m