On 7 May 2021 16:25:36 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 07 May 2021 at 17:19:04 BST, newshound
wrote:

On 07/05/2021 12:13, T i m wrote:

However, what we are doing then is comparing the taste of something we
are used to, something we shouldn't have been consuming in the first
place ('cows milk' was meant for 'cows', not humans

But humans have *evolved* to be able to consume it (at least, a lot
can). So how do you justify that statement?

He can't, beacuse what humans and other mammals have done is evolve to consume
milk - full stop.


Bwhahahahaa ... stupid Goblin, like you would have a clue about any of
this, you are *way* too old and stupid!

Huamn milk has a different make-up to cows milk, but both
contain lactose.

Doh, strange that a lot more than 60% of the population aren't
intolerant to the milk from their same *SPECIES* you weird freak!

And worse, we are talking about your sucking on a cows teat when you
are a big boy and supposed to be on solids!!!

Feck, even a calf doesn't keep drinking it's mothers milk as it grows
up, something you could try doing (growing up).

Cheers, T i m

ps. Infant *milk allergies* are rarely any form of lactose intolerance
and only one in 50 have it. *Massive* difference to adult lactose
intolerance levels of over 1 in 2.