On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:21:25 +0100, Andrew
wrote:

On 26/04/2021 15:34, T i m wrote:


No, they would be allowed to live out their natural lives after being
sterilised.


Who pays for that ?. Ain't free or cheap.

Anyone who actually cares for animals. Same as with any 'rescue'
today.

And how more tax are you, personally prepared to pay ?, in order
to feed them,

They would look after themselves (sheep in these areas I'm told we
can't otherwise use). People offering to let them live out their
natural lives in return for the cows cutting their grass (as they are
doing now).

house them and pay for vetinary bills (because if
you keep them confined and they need vetinary attention, and they
are prevented from getting it, then the RSPCA will prosecute you).

Then they will be slaughtered as planned?

Now tot up the total number of cows, sheep, pigs, geese, ducks
etc.

42?

Please don't bother with 'let them roam freely' argument, because
you cannot allow dairy bulls to roam free. They are dangerous.

See above. 5 years on, all gone.

There is no 'free' NHS for anaimals,

Of course there is. Vets are obliged to look after injured wild
animals and there are plenty of rescues that are funded by supporters
(so the animals don't have to pay).

and your bonkers plan would
cost so much, we would no longer have the money for a 'free' NHS
for humans.

Aww, so the rabbit hole you worked your way down doesn't work. Now
that is a surprise.

I bet if you weren't such a **** you could easily figure out how you
could make it work ... if it didn't mean you had to stop causing
animals unnecessary suffering and death etc?

Cheers, T i m