On 24/04/2021 08:46, T i m wrote:
, Spike wrote:

On 23/04/2021 21:08, T i m wrote:

But they can 'turn up' then and be party to what's going on? Even if
they aren't (always) allowed to actively participate the chances are
any discussions are likely to (try to) stay above board if there are
people with a vested / counter interest present.

So a non elected councilor could attend and is likely to make a
(passive) impact on proceedings.

That's a fine example of supposition piled upon supposition in order to
get the answer you want.

BS.

It's a genuine / real-world scenario confirming that 'anyone' can
often attend council meetings and therefore you wouldn't need to be a
councilor to be able to attend or even play a part.

"Even if...", " ...the chances are...", "...likely to...", and
"...if...", all quoted from the same sentence, add up to piling
supposition upon supposition, even if in your demented state you can't
see that.

The usual deflections follow.

But (left brainer), I'm not thinking that therefore 'just' a member of
the public (the councilors are also 'members of the public') has the
exact same opportunities as a councilor in such matters but given the
mower of social media these days, there is a good chance they may
have, as / when they get the opportunity to be present (even).

All very much part of my main question, not that you would have
understood that of course.

You would think you would learn from all these faceplants by now or is
it you are happy to keep taking them as long as you can be arguing
with someone?

Have you ever thought of standing on your own two feet?

Learning how to spell what your continually refer to as 'councilor'
might be a start.

--
Spike