On Apr 20, 2021 at 2:30:48 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 2:20:13 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 1:03:55 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with
the evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with
the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was
less even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat
predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are
referring to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific
sites. OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested
in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made
global climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

It isnt about reputable, its about the evidence presented with
science.

Peer reviewed studies.

Reviewed by other MMCC cult members...

Well respected scientific sites, recognized internationally.

It isnt about respect, its about the evidence presented with science.

Expert opinion.

It isnt about opinion, its about the evidence presented with science.

You reject evidence.

Nope.

We will simply not see eye-to-eye.

Yep, you are just another MMCC cult member.

You refer to those who look to evidence, reason, logic, science, and fact
checking as a "cult". Got it.

Again, not gonna see eye-to-eye on this.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.