wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:29:57 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:



wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:10:59 -0600, bud-- wrote:

On 4/10/2021 11:52 PM, Bod wrote:
On 10/04/2021 09:57, bud-- wrote:
On 4/10/2021 10:32 AM, Bod wrote:
Nice touch.
I'm surprised that Trump gave such a warm glowing tribute to him
though.

Isn't Philip alleged to have something to do with Epstein?

No.

It feels like there is a cast of thousands.

I dug out the order of succession I made a year ago
Next in line is Charles - IMHO he is a jerk
Harry is #6 - seems like the most interesting (like Diana), but about
impossible
Randy Andy is #8 - safely distant

What I think was said in "the interview" is that Harry's
?son to be will not be in the succession order. Why?

Wrong.
https://www.royal.uk/succession
That's archie, listed just under his dad harry.

Racism. They can't have a black royal. wouldn't be proper.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.

And he isnt black anyway.

I doubt he will be an only child

That lying cow is already pregnant again.

and every time they put the dice back in the
cup, her mom's genes get another shot at it.

Irrelevant to whether he is black or not and
he is already inline for succession if say some
terrorist manages to kill all the ones above
him at say Phil's funeral which has 30 of those
parasites including his dad at it with him
and his stupid mum staying back in the usa.