On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 1:36:52 PM UTC-4, Frank wrote:
On 4/2/2021 12:58 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Ralph Mowery writes:
In article , says...

As a counterpoint, This article actually shows the text of the
law and describes exactly how it disenfranchises voters.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/02/u...annotated.html

There was no fraud and the republicans have admitted outright they must
prevent legitimate voters from being able to vote in order to win an
election.

How is this not anti-american?



If there was no fraud it looks like the democrats would be pushing to
have the votes recounted or what ever it takes to prove the republicans
were just crying foul.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's up to
those claiming fraud to prove it.

And recounts happened in pretty much every swing state at the
insistance of the GOP, which, in conjunction with the 59 court
case dismissals for lack of evidence, conclusively proved that
the GOP was "just crying foul".

Supreme court under Roberts was gutless in not accepting case on their
merit. He was afraid overturning elections would cause riots. In this
case the terrorists won.

You are witless if you did not see the fraud.

AFAIK not a single case that reached the SC had anything to do with massive fraud
or even any fraud. It was the sore loser Trumpet minions complaining about the
rules of the election. Rules that were put in place BEFORE the election, when the
GOP had plenty of time to weigh in or bring court cases. But the rules were OK
until they lost. Only then
they went running to the SC, asking that all the legal votes of millions of voters in
entire states be tossed out because the state allowed two more days for mail-in
ballots to arrive. A difference that would not have changed the results anyway.