On 03/04/2021 09:28, T i m wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 02/04/2021 12:38, T i m wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 01/04/2021 15:05, T i m wrote:

The Mrs gave some kid an actual clip_round_the_ear (without really
thinking)

Child abuse, eh?

Well, if that were our kid and was doing the same we would have
considered it to be more 'see how you like it' and would have thanked
anyone for putting him / her straight.

So, you condone child abuse?

I condone what may now be describes as such today by snowflakes as it
was applied by sensible people *then*.

You have just confirmed you approve of child abuse. Shame on you.

Personally, I would consider exposing a child to the routine slaughter
on innocent / defenseless creatures to be way more abusive and
potentially mind affecting (for the rest of their lives), than any
'clip round the ear'.

Don't try that excuse in court. It won't go well.

Like you could ever have a balanced view on that. ;-(

because he was poking one of the chickens with a stick. It
was probably Spike, he saw one being slaughtered when a kid and it
didn't put him off so ... ;-(

FTAOD it was all the chickens, one or two at a time.

Lovely. All helping with the early conditioning.

Only following your Meat Eaters Licence rules, seventy years before you
thought of them.

Except the rules were really aimed at those typically buying 'meat'
*today* (where there as so many animals being slaughtered and so many
plant based alternatives available) everywhere. Not children being
routinely exposed to animal slaughter and the mental scarring /
normalisation of such abuse.

Furious piece of back-pedalling there to condone your views on child abuse.

Note that you're now so unhinged that you not only condemn people for
not following The Gospel According to T i m, but also for actually
following it.

WTF are you talking about?

I'm talking about you being a two-faced ****wit.

Ah, but only based on your twisted interpretation of things. Talk
English and I might understand you.

They are all things you have said, which (at different times) say
different things?

Such that in your rush (to condemn), you trip over yourself?

50 lines of attempted deflection away from an account of child abuse
snipped

Aww, poor nymshifting Spuke. Just like that other coward Fredxx, can't
actually discuss (only spuke out your selfish animal cruelty biased
bs) the core topic so roll out all sort of strawmen to try to cover
your desperation.

Ah, the abuse hurled by the very poor loser, having been shot down with
his own arguments?

Get help.

--
Spike