wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 23:22:09 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 3/19/2021 10:52 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:58:53 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 3/19/2021 3:39 PM, wrote:


If you can't attack the message, shoot the messenger.
Why didn't you tell us what part was wrong?
I just saw Fauci tell Rand Paul all of those things the other day on
C-Span. (that is live congress TV, not some opinion network).


Must have watched a different episode. I saw Paul interrupting Fauci
as
he tried to explain the reason and the varients that may or may not be
protected.

Rand Paul just wanted to show off and be a bully.

I saw Fauci telling us they don't know, over and over again about
everything.
Will they ever know enough to say it is 100% safe and will he get away
from the hysteria before then?
At a certain point we need the information to take a calculated risk
and isn't life just a series of calculated risks anyway?
We are quickly reaching the point that driving to the restaurant is
more dangerous than going in, mask or not.
The question Paul asked is, if your are vaccinated, why aren't you
safe and it is a good question. If not, why get the shot?


Every time Fauci tried to explain about the variants Paul cut him off.
He asked questions but did not want to hear answers, he wanted to make
his own statement.

https://tinyurl.com/336xnms7

Paul comes across as an arrogant politician that wants to show how smart
he is.

Paul was asking questions about studies that went against Fauci's agenda.

Wrong, as always. He was mindlessly rabitting on about
what is irrelevant to the points that Fauci was making.

Fauci was not responding to the questions asked.

Another bare faced lie. He was in fact pointing
out that the questions that Paul was endlessly
rabitting on about are irrelevant.

He just wanted to conjecture about variants

Another bare faced lie. He was in fact rubbing Paul's stupid
nose in the fact that the more virulent variants made Paul's
stupid question that he kept repeating irrelevant.

that have not really been studied.

Another bare faced lie.

"I don't know" would be a better answer

In fact he said we don't know, repeatedly.

than simply expanding on worse case scenarios
without actually saying "the vaccine might be
worthless on these strains".

Its very unlikely indeed that the vaccines are
worthless against the new more virulent variants.

That is what he implied tho.

Another bare faced lie. In fact he said that that is
why we need to keep wearing masks until its clear
how effective the vaccines are against the new more
virulent variants. And he said that very clearly indeed.