On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:13:10 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

snip

If T i m had an ounce of honesty in his bigotry and actually lived where
his food is grown,

WTF does that mean? That because you live in the sticks you think I
(of all people) don't know what goes on there?

he would know that what humans do to animals is
benign compared to what happens to them in the wild

Ah, yet another guilt trip BS chestnut.

So you are basing your moral compass on that of animals who do what
they do to survive?

When was the last time you *had* to hunt (with your bare hands and
teeth), kill and eat an animal raw, like all the other 'animals' do?

For a so called / self appointed philosopher you are a bit of a ****.

And does this benign act mean giving your prey a fair chance to escape
as it might have in the wild ... or do you use it's trust and
domesticity to trap it and put a bolt gun to it's head, or gas or
electrocute it? Do all male chickens in the wild end up blended?

What we do to innocent sentient creatures is far from benign, it's
cowardly and disgusting, disgusting that a so-called 'advanced'
species still treats other species we should be protecting, not
exploiting so ... especially when it's in our best interest to do so
for our health and the health of the planet.

If only you primitive backward bull****ters had the balls and decency
to tell the truth and admit you actually don't GAF about any one or
thing other than yourself and save your time trying to convince others
you are doing anything vaguely 'natural', *especially* in 2021.

You like the taste / texture of a selective and arbitrary sub-set of
all the animal species and you CGAF how much pain and suffering
(mental and physical) they have to endure before they are killed for
your consumption / exploitation - enjoyment.

Cheers, T i m