On 27/02/2021 14:35, bert wrote:
In article , RJH writes
On 26 Feb 2021 at 11:28:07 GMT, "The Natural Philosopher"
wrote:



As ****ing IGNORANT as Frau Merkel refusing the Astra Zeneca jab on the
grounds it 'doesn't work for over 65s'

Its British, it was there first, and has been rushed through tests
faster than any other vaccine and its efficacy is largely unknown that's
all.

To spin that into 'its ineffective' and refuse it to dying Germans in
order to save face for an utter failure by the EU and by Merkel to
protect their citizens is simply unacceptable.

F Merkel needs to be dancing the Spandau ballet


Just a POI - she's parroting their scientific advice. As she should -
however
odd that advice might seem.

But it was approved for all age groups by the EU regulatory body

Sigh. The Art Student Speaks. Whilst not defending Merkel, the
difference between approval - not harmful - and effective - actually
works - is a distinction that seems to have utterly escaped you.

There was insufficient data to say whether AZ was effective in over 50s.
They simply didn't risk testing it on older people, so the truth is not
that its ineffective, but that no one knows if it is. However there is
no reason why it would not be, and that is where the weaselling is
coming from - the Big Pharma lackeys scent disaster and no one buying up
their expensive vaccines if a not for profit one takes the world market.

They have bribed the right people to do a FUD on the competition.

That this will cost a million lives is something they will never be held
to account over, just like Blair and war crimes and Dr Kelly



--
€œwhen things get difficult you just have to lie€�

€• Jean Claud Jüncker