On 2/22/2021 10:08 AM, Bod wrote:
On 22/02/2021 16:02, Muggles wrote:
On 2/22/2021 9:55 AM, Bod wrote:
On 22/02/2021 15:49, Muggles wrote:
On 2/22/2021 9:37 AM, Bod wrote:
According to your bible: 'The Bible Tells Us When A Fetus Becomes A
Living Being'
Many people think that a human being is created at the time of
conception but this belief is not supported by the bible. The fact
that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the
formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a
living human being. According to the bible, a fetus is not a living
person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.
This is someone's interpretation of Gen 2:7 you're quoting below.
After God formed man in Genesis 2:7, He €śbreathed into his nostrils
the breath of life and it was then that the man became a living
being€ť. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects,
he was not a living being until after taking his first breath.
You're talking about God creating man.Â* That is not the same as
conception.
In Job 33:4, it states: €śThe spirit of God has made me, and the
breath of the Almighty gives me life.€ť
http://www.thechristianleftblog.org/...a-living-being
This scripture has many interpretations.
Muggles!Â* like most christians, you either don't know your bible or
you interpret what it says to suit what you want it to mean.
You think you can use someone's interpretation of scripture to back
your personal view of life.
No, I quote bible verses.
The bible is cobbled together out of Greek myths. It's choc full of
contradictions and errors.
Anyone can quote bible verses.
I note that you deleted the link to the 1000 contradictions.
No surprise there. You just don't want to read it.
I note you didn't respond to 'anyone can quote bible verses.'
--
Maggie