On 2/22/2021 9:10 AM, Fredxx wrote:
On 22/02/2021 03:56, Muggles wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:19 PM, Fredxx wrote:
On 21/02/2021 22:46, Muggles wrote:
On 2/21/2021 3:33 PM, Fredxx wrote:
On 21/02/2021 18:35, Rod Speed wrote:

reams of your **** flushed where it belongs


You seem to hate them sufficiently where you would like to remove
the choice between an abortion and saving a woman's life vs the
alternative.


The majority of the time women have a choice to have sex or not.
When they choose to have sex, they should also take responsibility
for the aftermath.Â* Pregnancy is a well-known result of sex, so for
her to kill an innocent child, she commits murder by taking the life
of another innocent human being.

That's without the mental health aspects of carrying a baby after a
rape to full term.

Pregnancy from rape removes the premise of choice to have sex.Â* When
force removes ones choice to risk conception, the woman STILL has a
choice to save a life of an innocent child or to kill an innocent
child.
Killing innocent children is still murder, although many people
believe in justifiable homicide.Â* Are you one of those who opt for
the latter?


That's a very big leap. I have already said I do not condone murder.
Why you would think so is beyond any reasonable person's comprehension.


You have repeatedly stated you approve of women killing their babies
because they should have control of their own bodies,


I have never, ever said that. Please read what I have said, not what you
think I have said.

You believe women should be able to abort their children. What do you
think happens when they abort them? They already have control over
their bodies and they make choices to have sex and often get pregnant
from that choice. The problem with your reasoning is choice does not
include aborting innocent babies without also receiving the title of
baby killer.

You can't defend women's right to CHOOSE ABORTION without also condoning
the killing of innocent babies.


--
Maggie