On Feb 20, 2021 at 9:05:50 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
:

Snit wrote:
On Feb 20, 2021 at 4:01:56 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
:
Fredxx wrote:

Only where it deals with restrictions on late term abortions, where
the baby may be viable - it's reasonable to prohibit elective
abortions in that period, but to protect the mother's health or life,
or in cases where the baby will be severely deformed at birth, it
should be allowed.

I was under the impression that the current UK law does largely reflect
that opinion.

I would presume so, I don't live in the UK, but most would agree that
late term abortions should only be done when necessary.

And they are. If there are any exceptions in the US that can be verified I not
see the evidence.


It depends on state law, but that is the law in at least most states.

Fewer than 1% of all abortions, and when they do happen it is generally
because of:

* Challenges in being able to get an abortion sooner -- so the right wingers
who add hurdles are a key reason for this edge case they claim to be concerned
with. These hurdles can be financial or having a clinic near by.

* Fetal anomalies: generally structural in nature, and when there is little
chance for viability. Yet right wingers want to force the woman to give birth
to a non-viable baby. It is cruelty.

* High risk to the pregnant woman. They promote death as they claim to be
pro-life.




https://www.kff.org/womens-health-po...-in-pregnancy/


https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/my...are-the-facts/


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.