On Feb 20, 2021 at 4:18:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
:

"Rod Speed" wrote:
"Joel" wrote in message
...
"Rod Speed" wrote:
"Joel" wrote in message
...
Fredxx wrote:

I agree, but can we agree it's not sexist for parliament [1] stipulate
the terms of an abortion.

[1] where so it happens MPs are voted in by a majority of women (in the
electorate and likelihood of voting).

Only where it deals with restrictions on late term abortions, where
the baby may be viable - it's reasonable to prohibit elective
abortions in that period, but to protect the mother's health or life,
or in cases where the baby will be severely deformed at birth, it
should be allowed.

Why not after it is born ?

*That* *is* murder.

Just as true before it is born.


Only when it's done late enough in pregnancy that the baby may be
viable, and there is no risk to the mother's health or life. Earlier
in pregnancy, it is definitely not equivalent to murder.

How could it be? The claim makes no sense.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.