On 2/6/2021 3:44 AM, jimmy wrote:
On 2/6/21 12:24 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 20:09:30 -0800, Bob F wrote:
On 2/5/2021 7:06 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:57:22 -0700, rbowman wrote:
On 02/05/2021 07:16 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/5/2021 3:08 AM, micky wrote:
Well you're right but it's a big flaw in the system.** Anyone who
really
tries can, with a little practice, learn to give non-answers and
stupid
answers and large number of people listeing will believe them.** So
reporters in these cases just become master of ceremonies for the
performances of liars etc.
Yes, there is a huge flaw in the system.* Uneducated voters that
think
someone like that would be good to have in Congress.
There is a huge flaw -- uneducated voters vote.
It does seem to be the democrats who go out of their way to register
aliens, winos, bums and homeless people.
BS.
Not when you think about and actually look at their registration
drives. They sign up anyone with a pulse.
It would be nice if the democrats signed up some taxpayers to help pay
off the national debt.
That is exactly what Biden is doing, just like Democrats always to. By
doing things that help grow the economy. It always grows bs=est under
Democratic Presidents.
"A president has only limited control over the economy. And yet there
has been a stark pattern in the United States for nearly a century. The
economy has grown significantly faster under Democratic presidents than
Republican ones.
Its true about almost any major indicator: gross domestic product,
employment, incomes, productivity, even stock prices. Its true if you
examine only the precise period when a president is in office, or
instead assume that a presidents policies affect the economy only after
a lag and dont start his economic clock until months after he takes
office. The gap holds almost regardless of how you define success, two
economics professors at Princeton, Alan Blinder and Mark Watson, write.
They describe it as startlingly large.
Annual G.D.P. growth rate
Since 1933, the economy has grown at an annual average rate of 4.6
percent under Democratic presidents and 2.4 percent under Republicans,
according to a Times analysis. In more concrete terms: The average
income of Americans would be more than double its current level if the
economy had somehow grown at the Democratic rate for all of the past
nine decades. If anything, that period (which is based on data
availability) is too kind to Republicans, because it excludes the
portion of the Great Depression that happened on Herbert Hoovers watch."
Check the graphs on the page.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/02/o...3e91b65130eb97